41CL Maximum registers for DATA/PROGS storage

[Sylvain Cote]

(07-25-2018 12:09 PM)Ángel Martin Wrote:  

(07-20-2018 06:22 AM)Podalirius Wrote:  I readed Cl XPMEM manual: seems that the commands for use of the additional 1024 registers are more byte consuming.

Looks like this thread is more about the RAMBOX but just for completion sake - yes, using the Expanded register functions (YSTO, YRCL, etc...) has a more demanding byte consumption. However you have more standard memory for your program code - since no standard DATA registers are needed.

Answer coming from the creator of the module ... what can you ask more.
I had not seen the implied question and thus never answered it.
Thank you Àngel.
Sylvain