Post Reply 
41CL Maximum registers for DATA/PROGS storage
07-25-2018, 12:09 PM (This post was last modified: 07-25-2018 12:09 PM by Ángel Martin.)
Post: #19
RE: 41CL Maximum registers for DATA/PROGS storage
(07-20-2018 06:22 AM)Podalirius Wrote:  I readed Cl XPMEM manual: seems that the commands for use of the additional 1024 registers are more byte consuming.

Looks like this thread is more about the RAMBOX but just for completion sake - yes, using the Expanded register functions (YSTO, YRCL, etc...) has a more demanding byte consumption. However you have more standard memory for your program code - since no standard DATA registers are needed.

"To live or die by your own sword one must first learn to wield it aptly."
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: 41CL Maximum registers for DATA/PROGS storage - Ángel Martin - 07-25-2018 12:09 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)