Post Reply 
What I never liked much in books that should provide knowledge.
07-18-2018, 04:16 PM
Post: #1
What I never liked much in books that should provide knowledge.
[Image: oergVBgnn256dJoMevJ5QtsF58nJVi7HGjqHW1sA...25932be1bf]

https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/8...s_i_guess/

I would make a quick analogy with annotated chess games. Something on the line "here there is a beautiful mate in 7, but I won't deprive you from the pleasure to find it". No, one can take time and try by himself, but the book should provide a solution at least.

Why? Because a book cannot talk or change, is fixed in time, so if one is stuck the book doesn't help and fail in its purpose.

Wikis are great, Contribute :)
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
What I never liked much in books that should provide knowledge. - pier4r - 07-18-2018 04:16 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)