Post Reply 
Decimals to improper fractions program?
06-09-2018, 02:54 PM
Post: #19
RE: Decimals to improper fractions program?
(06-09-2018 11:46 AM)Dieter Wrote:  355/113 It's much better than 333/106 and far more efficient than the "next best" fraction 103993/33102.

In engineering practice more important the relative error. In this case the results are:

Code:
+/- 1.000% error:  19/6, 
+/- 0.100% error:  22/7, 
+/- 0.010% error: 289/92, 
+/- 0.001% error: 355/113

Csaba
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Decimals to improper fractions program? - Csaba Tizedes - 06-09-2018 02:54 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)