A shorter Pause (PSE) in a program

[4ster]

Thanks again, everyone.

4 VIEW Xs worked with no stack disturbance. That solution operated with slightly more delay than 0 SIN +. Both fit requirements since I am only using X: and Y: in the stack at that point in the program.

So now I have to choose. rprosperi's point about my future self figuring out what was in my mind today is well taken. I've got some real head scratchers from 20+ years ago that I didn't document for my current self: I ended up rewriting one, since it still solved a work related task. I've learned to document better as the mind calcifies.

I think the VIEW X method wins for it's simplicity. It has the added benefit that it is easily adjustable by simply adding or subtracting a VIEW X (or two X<>Ys) to adjust the delay under flag 1.

Again, thank you for the help!