Summation based benchmark for calculators - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum) +-- Forum: HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers) (/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: General Forum (/forum-4.html) +--- Thread: Summation based benchmark for calculators (/thread-9750.html) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 RE: Summation based test for calculators - grsbanks - 01-02-2018 01:39 PM (01-02-2018 01:36 PM)pier4r Wrote:  Oh. I know that the 12C was a business model but I thought that the basic trig/exp was there. My bad. Removing. \( e^x \) and \( y^x \) are there, it's just the trig functions that are not RE: Summation based test for calculators - xerxes - 01-03-2018 02:46 PM A record breaking result for your list: TI-62 max=10 using a loop 63.5 seconds 13.71183502 RE: Summation based test for calculators - pier4r - 01-03-2018 04:00 PM (01-03-2018 02:46 PM)xerxes Wrote:  A record breaking result for your list: TI-62 max=10 using a loop 63.5 seconds 13.71183502 Thanks for the info that is even slower than me manually (although with a newer calc, the 506w). Impressive. And I have even a couple of ideas that I can be, without much stress, even faster with the 506w. In the previous test I put the value in X, I recalled the formula in F4 and I added the result to M with M+. I could just use M as increment, The formula in F4 as A+function(M) and then save the result in A. This may be clearly faster than my 47 seconds. Maybe I can break the 40s barrier. I will try when I have time. edit: anyone with a 71B ? RE: Summation based test for calculators - grsbanks - 01-03-2018 04:05 PM (01-03-2018 04:00 PM)pier4r Wrote:  Thanks for the info that is even slower than me manually (although with a newer calc, the 506w). The TI-53 might be even slower than that. I'll give it a go this evening. Edit: Nope. The TI-62 is slower. Kind of... With only 32 (non-merged) steps to play with I couldn't do a loop a fixed number of times so I let it run for about 15 minutes and then stopped it to see how many iterations had been completed. It was completing them at a rate of one iteration every 5.64 seconds. RE: Summation based test for calculators - pier4r - 01-09-2018 10:20 PM Little bump: still missing - 71B - Some sharp PC - other capable (programmable or with sum function) calculators Really no one with a 71B? Pretty please! Virtual hugs! RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - TheKaneB - 01-09-2018 10:53 PM Sharp EL-5120 Solver With 100 iteration it runs for approx. 36 seconds, giving a result of 139.297187 (all digits correct according to my HP Prime). It lacks proper loop instructions, so I used a manual counter with a IF ... GOTO instruction Code: ``` X1 = 1 A1 = 0 LABEL A A1 = A1 + 3 (e^(sin(atan(X1)))) X1 = X1 + 1 IF X1 <= 100 GOTO A PRINT A1``` RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Michael de Estrada - 01-10-2018 07:52 PM HP-33C (Spice): N=10, 44 sec, Result=13.71183501 HP-25C (Woodstock): N=10, 29 sec, Result=13.71183501 Again, the older Woodstock is significantly faster than the newer Spice. RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - pier4r - 01-10-2018 08:13 PM I am impressed by the 33C, 34C and the TI equivalents. A 71B? Anyone? RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Michael de Estrada - 01-10-2018 08:50 PM I edited my post above to add the HP-25C. RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Michael de Estrada - 01-11-2018 08:11 PM HP-65 N=10, Time= 32 sec, Result= 13.71183501 N=100, Time= 329 sec, Result= 139.2971873 which is 11 sec faster than the HP-67. RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - pier4r - 01-11-2018 08:19 PM Added. Much appreciated! Someone with a 71B! For the glory! maybe is it not possible? If I remember correctly the 71B should be basic programmable but maybe I am confused. RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Maximilian Hohmann - 01-11-2018 08:30 PM (01-11-2018 08:19 PM)pier4r Wrote:  Someone with a 71B! For the glory! Which program or formula? There are so many on this tread that I lost count... A 71B would be ready here on my desk! RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - pier4r - 01-11-2018 08:42 PM (01-11-2018 08:30 PM)Maximilian Hohmann Wrote:  Which program or formula? There are so many on this tread that I lost count... A 71B would be ready here on my desk! http://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-9750-post-86751.html#pid86751 see the frmula in the middle of the post. It is written in bold "formula to use". If you want to use a program that is equivalent, you can do it too. I cannot provide you a program though, I do not posses a 71B. Und Tausend Dank! RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Maximilian Hohmann - 01-11-2018 09:16 PM Allora ... col HP-71B, usando un programma semplicissimo: Code: ```5 X=0 10 FOR I=1 TO 1000 20 X=X+(EXP(SIN(ATAN(I))))^(0.333) 30 NEXT I 40 PRINT X``` ottengo un risultato in 2 minuti e 58 secondi. Adesso proverò la stessa cosa con un HP-75D (se riesco a ricordormi come si fa a programmarlo). Saluti, Max Edit: Lo stesso programma eseguito dal mio HP-75D ottiene un risultato (uguale!) in 2 primi e 28 secondi. RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - pier4r - 01-11-2018 10:03 PM Woah. Kannst du Italienisch? (Kann ich Sie duzen?) Auf jedem fall, wenn es möglich ist, lieber auf Deutsch schreiben, dass ich üben muss. Translated: Woah, can you speak Italian? (Can I use the informal you with You?) Anyway, if possible, I'd like to write in German, since I must train. Edit. Ergebnisse hinzugefügt. Fast 3 Minuten, oder 2 un halb sind nicht schlecht. Results added. 3 minutes (almost) or 2 and half are not that bad. RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Maximilian Hohmann - 01-11-2018 10:17 PM (01-11-2018 10:03 PM)pier4r Wrote:  Kann ich Sie duzen? Sure, "You can say you to me" as former German chancellor Kohl (allegedly) once said to Margaret Thatcher :-) And yes, I (still) speak some Italian because I had the big luck to grow up in that beautiful country (all in all I lived there for 20 years and will almost certainly return there when I have to retire from work). One of my proud possessions is an unused HP-97 with Italian box and manuals which they threw away in the research facility where my father worked - it still has it's engraved "Euratom" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Atomic_Energy_Community) inventory plaque on it's back :-) Unfortunately I don't have it here so I can't run the benchmark on it now. Edit: In the meantime I ran the exact same BASIC program on a Casio FX-880P. It takes 2 minutes and 38 seconds (for 1000 loops), so almost exactly in the middle of the HP-71 and 75. Mind you, the Casio came nearly 10 years after the HP-75 and yet it is slower! RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Michael de Estrada - 01-11-2018 10:50 PM Los resultados deben estar identicos a los mismos en el HP 67. RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - pier4r - 01-12-2018 08:44 AM Is the hp 97 not the big brother of the hp 67? Shouldn't it be faster? edit: added the 880P (now it has 2 results) plus, yes Italy is nice (its landscapes) as mostly every place in the world. I mean even the tundra in Russia is peculiar in some way. Still I don't like the average mindset there, at least from the regions under Florence/Rome. In the North they were/are a little bit more organized (nonetheless there are some groups in the North that, well, are a bit backwards. Like people following separatists parties in the North-East or populists). RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - grsbanks - 01-12-2018 08:47 AM (01-11-2018 10:50 PM)Michael de Estrada Wrote:  Los resultados deben estar identicos a los mismos en el HP 67. Si. El HP-97 es simplemente un HP-67 con una impresora. RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators - Michael de Estrada - 01-18-2018 09:47 PM HP-32S (Pioneer) 1000 loops —> 206 seconds, Result = 1395.34628770 100 loops —> 23 seconds, Result = 139.29718705 10 loops —> 3 seconds, Result = 13.71183502