+- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum)
+-- Forum: HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers) (/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: General Forum (/forum-4.html)
+--- Thread: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? (/thread-8429.html)
48G thousands separator in Standard number? - lemontea - 05-31-2017 02:59 AM
Folks, is there a way to get thousands separator in Standard number format on the 48G series?
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - cyrille de brébisson - 05-31-2017 04:45 AM
Hello,
No, the HP48 does not have that function, sorry.
Cyrille
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - Chris Dreher - 05-31-2017 06:21 AM
(05-31-2017 02:59 AM)lemontea Wrote: Folks, is there a way to get thousands separator in Standard number format on the 48G series?
Just for my own education, which of the several number formats that exist in the world is standard format? My Google searches didn't help.
The 48G/GX supports 2 number formats: 123,456,789.00 and 123.456.789,00. The mode is selected by having flag 51 cleared or set, respectively. Cleared is the default mode. The easiest way to switch modes is to go into the MODES UI (press r-shift, CST button) and then navigate the UI to the "FM," checkbox.
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - Massimo Gnerucci - 05-31-2017 07:30 AM
(05-31-2017 06:21 AM)Chris Dreher Wrote:(05-31-2017 02:59 AM)lemontea Wrote: Folks, is there a way to get thousands separator in Standard number format on the 48G series?
Just for my own education, which of the several number formats that exist in the world is standard format? My Google searches didn't help.
The 48G/GX supports 2 number formats: 123,456,789.00 and 123.456.789,00. The mode is selected by having flag 51 cleared or set, respectively. Cleared is the default mode. The easiest way to switch modes is to go into the MODES UI (press r-shift, CST button) and then navigate the UI to the "FM," checkbox.
Right in the MODES menu: number format choice is Std (Standard), Fix, Sci, Eng.
You can't have thousand separators in Std mode
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - SlideRule - 05-31-2017 11:20 AM
(05-31-2017 02:59 AM)lemontea Wrote: ... thousands separator...
a.k.a. the RADIX separator, which then includes the decimal as well as the thousands separator.
BEST!
SlideRule
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - Massimo Gnerucci - 05-31-2017 11:24 AM
(05-31-2017 11:20 AM)SlideRule Wrote:(05-31-2017 02:59 AM)lemontea Wrote: ... thousands separator...
a.k.a. the RADIX separator, which then includes the decimal as well as the thousands separator.
BEST!
SlideRule
Yes, but choice of radix is unrelated to the presence or not of thousands delimiters.
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - SlideRule - 05-31-2017 11:35 AM
(05-31-2017 11:24 AM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote: Yes, but...
Do you normally select just the thousands separator on a calculator or does this selection include the decimal separator at the same time? You can have a decimal separator without a thousands separator, but, the inverse?
BEST!
SlideRule
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - Massimo Gnerucci - 05-31-2017 11:43 AM
(05-31-2017 11:35 AM)SlideRule Wrote:(05-31-2017 11:24 AM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote: Yes, but...
Do you normally select just the thousands separator on a calculator or does this selection include the decimal separator at the same time? You can have a decimal separator without a thousands separator, but, the inverse?
BEST!
SlideRule
I can choose to have the thousand separator or not. Clear now?
Please read again the OP question.
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - Vtile - 05-31-2017 01:17 PM
I must say that most implementation sucks on this regard. Here where I live the comma is the official decimal mark, while the dot is not in use and the thousand separation is mostly done with space. Since the nation is small there is not much market specific models around so people use dot and comma intuitively on computing devices for the decimal point (or radix if you prefer). The worst systems are the ones that mix the dot and comma, 15C is almost unusable in this regard and it still at times leaves me wondering what does read on the display.
The problem is not the radix, but the urge to mix the dot and comma with the thousand separation. I personally use dot in 50g because IIRC the comma as a radix introduced some quirks to the UI (or were it the dot as thousand separation *yak*).
Edit. Dot to Comma in the last sentence.
Edit2. I just noticed that 50g also uses this thousand separiation thing, no wonder I always keep it in ENG mode.
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - Massimo Gnerucci - 05-31-2017 02:35 PM
IIRC (from a mockup picture) WP43S will allow much more choices in this regard
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - cyrille de brébisson - 06-01-2017 05:05 AM
Hello,
HP Prime does have around 10 different choices, including small spaces for 1000 separators...
However, using , as a separator on a high end calc has its own issues.. Among others the fact that , is used as an arguement separator and ; as an instruction separator...
So, in , mode, we have some conflicts to deal with.
Cyrille
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - Vtile - 06-01-2017 11:22 AM
(06-01-2017 05:05 AM)cyrille de brébisson Wrote: Hello,It is a good thing to hear that the "small space" is an option in Prime. It seems to be also ISO and BIPM recommended format for digit grouping.
HP Prime does have around 10 different choices, including small spaces for 1000 separators...
However, using , as a separator on a high end calc has its own issues.. Among others the fact that , is used as an arguement separator and ; as an instruction separator...
So, in , mode, we have some conflicts to deal with.
Cyrille
I wonder what hex value one should modify on 50g rom to change the digit grouping symbol from ie. comma to char(184) or char(180) while radix is a dot. I would think the masking is done only in one place in the ROM. Even 0001BD60 to 0001BE60 type of answer would give an idea where to look.
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - SlideRule - 06-02-2017 12:01 AM
ALL
Interesting follow on discussions concerning digits grouping and decimal separation. The following url(s) may not be known to all and offer a concise edification with respect to both topics:
a) How the world separates its digits
b) How the world separates its decimals
Again, thanks for the open and edifying discussion.
ENJOY!
SlideRule
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - Raymond Del Tondo - 06-03-2017 05:40 PM
(05-31-2017 02:59 AM)lemontea Wrote: Folks, is there a way to get thousands separator in Standard number format on the 48G series?As others wrote, not out of the box.
But you could try the SpeedUI stack interface, which (amongst many other things) offers a thousands separator display option:-)
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - lemontea - 06-03-2017 06:40 PM
(06-03-2017 05:40 PM)Raymond Del Tondo Wrote:(05-31-2017 02:59 AM)lemontea Wrote: Folks, is there a way to get thousands separator in Standard number format on the 48G series?As others wrote, not out of the box.
But you could try the SpeedUI stack interface, which (amongst many other things) offers a thousands separator display option:-)
Hi Ray, thanks. I have come across SpeedUI but as I understand, it requires more than 128K?
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - Raymond Del Tondo - 06-04-2017 09:50 AM
(06-03-2017 06:40 PM)lemontea Wrote:Only if you install all bells and whistles;-)(06-03-2017 05:40 PM)Raymond Del Tondo Wrote: As others wrote, not out of the box.
But you could try the SpeedUI stack interface, which (amongst many other things) offers a thousands separator display option:-)
Hi Ray, thanks. I have come across SpeedUI but as I understand, it requires more than 128K?
A while ago I made a version of SpeedUI which will run on an unexpanded 48G with 32K RAM.
Currently the minimal "normal" setup (CF,UI,UFL) is about 55K in size,
the version with lite UI is about 27K in size.
RE: 48G thousands separator in Standard number? - lemontea - 06-04-2017 04:12 PM
Thanks I will check it out. I already have it downloaded somewhere.