HP Forums
Definition of "Fully Blown" - Printable Version

+- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum)
+-- Forum: HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers) (/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: General Forum (/forum-4.html)
+--- Thread: Definition of "Fully Blown" (/thread-2829.html)

Pages: 1 2


RE: Definition of "Fully Blown" - brouhaha - 01-12-2015 02:41 AM

I never heard "fully-blown", but I've heard "full-blown" about many things other than HP calculators. For HP-41 and -71B, the phrase I usually heard was "fully loaded".


RE: Definition of "Fully Blown" - vk6ti - 01-12-2015 03:51 AM

I worked in the explosives field for about 15 years, and the term
"fully blown", means a job well done, or a catastrophic result. We did 41C's in the 80's and we called them "hotted up". All sounds too familiar to the hot rod fraternity. :-)

Ray


RE: Definition of "Fully Blown" - Mark Hardman - 01-12-2015 04:02 AM

(01-12-2015 03:51 AM)vk6ti Wrote:  I worked in the explosives field for about 15 years, and the term
"fully blown", means a job well done, or a catastrophic result. We did 41C's in the 80's and we called them "hotted up". All sounds too familiar to the hot rod fraternity. :-)

Ray

"A job well done" or "a catastrophic result"?

I get it. When speaking of explosive ordinance, failure to produce a catastrophic result would be considered a failure (a job not well done).

I would like to think of my HP-41CLs as being "souped up".


RE: Definition of "Fully Blown" - John W Kercheval - 01-12-2015 07:14 PM

Thomas Klemm: Very interesting post. I've not seen that before.


RE: Definition of "Fully Blown" - Thomas Klemm - 01-12-2015 09:18 PM

(01-12-2015 07:14 PM)John W Kercheval Wrote:  Very interesting post. I've not seen that before.

You might like these old posts then:
old photo with hp logo or name
Hi definition images of the HP-19C decimal dot

Enjoy
Thomas

PS: Unfortunately some of the mentioned pictures can't be accessed anymore.


RE: Definition of "Fully Blown" - Katie Wasserman - 01-13-2015 02:43 AM

(01-11-2015 11:51 PM)Thomas Klemm Wrote:  I guess this was the source:
.....

Yep!