HP Forums
Recent articles about calculators in hackaday. - Printable Version

+- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum)
+-- Forum: Not HP Calculators (/forum-7.html)
+--- Forum: Not remotely HP Calculators (/forum-9.html)
+--- Thread: Recent articles about calculators in hackaday. (/thread-14618.html)



Recent articles about calculators in hackaday. - compsystems - 03-08-2020 02:31 PM

THE LAST SCIENTIFIC CALCULATOR?
https://hackaday.com/2020/03/02/the-last-scientific-calculator/

A CALCULATOR IN 2020?
https://hackaday.com/2020/03/07/a-calculator-in-2020/


RE: Recent articles about calculators in hackaday. - Maximilian Hohmann - 03-08-2020 02:58 PM

Hello!

(03-08-2020 02:31 PM)compsystems Wrote:  THE LAST SCIENTIFIC CALCULATOR?

Strange. It seems to me that this author stumbled across an HP Prime and/or it's software emulations by chance and wrote his text without doing the slightest additional research. Since the Prime appeared on the market in 2013, companies like Ti, Casio and Sharp (and maybe others too) have released several new scientific calculators. Which means that the HP Prime may be everything, but certainly not "The last scientific calculator".

Regards
Max


RE: Recent articles about calculators in hackaday. - mfleming - 03-08-2020 03:13 PM

The comment section of these two articles look like threads on MoHPC Smile


RE: Recent articles about calculators in hackaday. - pinkman - 09-05-2020 09:32 AM

(03-08-2020 02:58 PM)Maximilian Hohmann Wrote:  Hello!

(03-08-2020 02:31 PM)compsystems Wrote:  THE LAST SCIENTIFIC CALCULATOR?

Strange. It seems to me that this author stumbled across an HP Prime and/or it's software emulations by chance and wrote his text without doing the slightest additional research. Since the Prime appeared on the market in 2013, companies like Ti, Casio and Sharp (and maybe others too) have released several new scientific calculators. Which means that the HP Prime may be everything, but certainly not "The last scientific calculator".

Regards
Max

I had the same feeling, I had to convince myself that the article was not written in 2013. Maybe he considers that the other calculators are less scientific than educational?