![]() |
Engineering Procedure - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum) +-- Forum: Not HP Calculators (/forum-7.html) +--- Forum: Not remotely HP Calculators (/forum-9.html) +--- Thread: Engineering Procedure (/thread-13408.html) |
Engineering Procedure - SlideRule - 08-03-2019 12:56 PM Seen by many: enjoyed by a few; understood by ? [attachment=7578] BEST! SlideRule RE: Engineering Procedure - Garth Wilson - 08-03-2019 06:25 PM I imagine it's understood by most people on this forum. An hour-long video about the oberon language has a couple of quotes I really liked (at around 36 minutes into in, give or take):
RE: Engineering Procedure - toml_12953 - 08-04-2019 05:56 AM (08-03-2019 06:25 PM)Garth Wilson Wrote: I imagine it's understood by most people on this forum. Most places I worked use these criteria:
RE: Engineering Procedure - Alex S - 08-06-2019 08:37 AM (08-03-2019 06:25 PM)Garth Wilson Wrote: I imagine it's understood by most people on this forum. Underneath Niklaus Wirths heading "What have I learnt?" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXY78gPMvl0&t=1975s you can find:
Great and humble insights from a real genius. RE: Engineering Procedure - pier4r - 08-07-2019 04:52 PM Thanks for sharing. From my experience complexity (or unreadability) comes from (a) vanity or (b) incompetence. In the case (b) the one writing something complex or redundant or verbose, doesn't realize how to make it simpler. For me a program/math model can be even long, but it is easy to read, change, update, understand. |