No, a Schrodinger reference. But Math had this kind of indeterminacy first!
(02-21-2017 10:12 PM)KeithB Wrote: [ -> ]No, a Schrodinger reference. But Math had this kind of indeterminacy first!
Sure, Schrödingers cat, but I suppose Han made a wordplay about my explanations "blurry uncertainty"
(02-21-2017 09:17 PM)Han Wrote: [ -> ] (02-21-2017 09:15 PM)EdDereDdE Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not good at explaining exactly what I meean, you get my point maybe.
Is that a Heisenberg reference? :-)
(02-21-2017 10:12 PM)KeithB Wrote: [ -> ]No, a Schrodinger reference. But Math had this kind of indeterminacy first!
I think that Han is not the kind of person of whom one could doubt that he confuses Heisenberg with Schrödinger. :-)
Actually, if f(x) and g(x) tends to 0 as x->0 and f and g are analytic at x=0 with f not identically 0, then f(x)^g(x) tends to 1, but if you remove the analytic hypothesis, then the limit could be anything, not just 0 or 1. For example f(x)=exp(-1/x^2) and g(x)=a*x^2, the limit is exp(-a).