This video presents a lovely pandigital approximation for Euler's e:
Pauli
Speaking of pandigital approximations,
Happy '5*EXP(6)-INV(LN(1039-EXP(-LN(2^(7-√4+8)))))' !
Not so lovely, but this should evaluate (almost) nicely on the wp34s (DBLOFF).
Gerson.
I've got a nice one that doesn't use any digits:
π →HR TANH TAN⁻¹ x²
Degrees mode only. Use FIX 0 or add an IP to the end.
Pauli
Not so accurate, but digits 1 through 9 in order (well, sort of):
'EXP(EXP(EXP(EXP(-.345678912))))-INV(π)+INV(π^π+INV(π)+e)+(π^π)^-π'
Okay, I'll use two sequential digits:
\( \lfloor 5 e^6 \rfloor \)
Or just unity but two levels of exponents:
\( \lfloor e^{10^{SINH^{-1}1}} \rfloor \)
(01-01-2017 08:43 AM)Paul Dale Wrote: [ -> ]Or just unity but two levels of exponents:
\( \lfloor e^{10^{SINH^{-1}1}} \rfloor \)
Nice one-digit one! I still can't make it without all ten of them, though:
\(\lfloor 6.538472901! \rfloor \)
(01-01-2017 10:44 AM)Gerson W. Barbosa Wrote: [ -> ]\(\lfloor 6.538472901! \rfloor \)
You don't need the
01 at the end
Pauli
Or without all ten of them, twice:
'6.538472901!-EXP(-6.978245310)'
(01-01-2017 11:03 AM)Paul Dale Wrote: [ -> ] (01-01-2017 10:44 AM)Gerson W. Barbosa Wrote: [ -> ]\(\lfloor 6.538472901! \rfloor \)
You don't need the 01 at the end
Pauli
I know, but the family gathering would not be complete without the patriarchs :-)