06-09-2014, 12:05 PM
hi,
I certainly don't want to write much text:
I miss the functionality on the softkeys in the home and cas mode which I think most users do.
Tonight I thought about a suggestion. Customizable keys would be of greatest value. One set in home and one in cas.
Would it be realizable to somehow match the user keyboard? You could introduce 'virtual' keys like K_F1.HOME and K_F1.cas e.g.. Just like user keyboard functions. A command like lbl could define what is printed on the key.
e.g. the additional keys would be defined in the user_keys program.
KEY K_F1.HOME()
LBL(""F1 in home");
BEGIN
//functionality for the individual
END;
But of course any other way, say a list of program calls in the settings could do the job. Only empty Fkeys are soooo wasted.
Is there a change of implementation???
I certainly don't want to write much text:
I miss the functionality on the softkeys in the home and cas mode which I think most users do.
Tonight I thought about a suggestion. Customizable keys would be of greatest value. One set in home and one in cas.
Would it be realizable to somehow match the user keyboard? You could introduce 'virtual' keys like K_F1.HOME and K_F1.cas e.g.. Just like user keyboard functions. A command like lbl could define what is printed on the key.
e.g. the additional keys would be defined in the user_keys program.
KEY K_F1.HOME()
LBL(""F1 in home");
BEGIN
//functionality for the individual
END;
But of course any other way, say a list of program calls in the settings could do the job. Only empty Fkeys are soooo wasted.
Is there a change of implementation???