The Prime and CASIO Classpad 2 both fail to integrate the indefinite integral
(3 NROOT x^2 -2*x + 1)^4
The NSpire is successful, produces (3*(x-1)^(11/3))/11
Any guidance on how to enter the integral differently so that the Prime can handle it?
It's a bit cumbersome, but you have to do this:
factor(x^2-2*x-1) -> (x-1)^2
Therefore:
factor(int(((x-1)^2)^(4/3),x)) -> (3*(x-1)^3*((x-1)^(1/3))^2)/11
Welcome those who have a less cumbersome answer!
I apologize:
factor(x^2-2*x+1) -> (x-1)^2
Therefore:
factor(int(((x-1)^2)^(4/3),x)) -> (3*(x-1)^3*((x-1)^(1/3))^2)/11
The problem is that the Prime doesn't do the factorization itself.
Arno
Perhaps the peoblem comes from xCas...
(08-14-2020 03:44 AM)lrdheat Wrote: [ -> ]The Prime and CASIO Classpad 2 both fail to integrate the indefinite integral
(3 NROOT x^2 -2*x + 1)^4
The NSpire is successful, produces (3*(x-1)^(11/3))/11
Any guidance on how to enter the integral differently so that the Prime can handle it?
However, the "successsful" result were wrong.
f(x) = |x-1| ^ (8/3)
If x ≥ 1, F(x) - F(1) = 3/11 * |x-1|^(11/3)
If x < 1, F(x) - F(1) =
−3/11 * |x-1|^(11/3)
→ F(x) = 3/11 * (x-1) * |x-1|^(8/3) + C
XCas> F := int(abs(x-1)^(8/3),x)
XCas> F := factor(F)
→ \(\large \frac{3 \left(x-1\right)^{3} \left(\left((x-1) \mathrm{sign}\left(x-1\right)\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}\right)^{2}}{11}\)
Hi Albert,
Are you sure about this? When I do this problem using numerical integration On the Prime, Classpad, and TI-30X Pro Math Print, I get 3.46+ which equals the “correct” NSpire result. This does not agree with your result (unless I am doing something wrong...).
My HP 50g produces -3.46...
Here comes the problem that always puts me in difficulty. If I set CAS without "use i to factor polynomials" I get:
sqrt((x-1)^2) -> abs(x-1)
and the integral
int(abs(x-1)^(8/3),x)
takes the form proposed by Albert Chan. However, if I set CAS with "use i to factor polynomials", the result takes the form of "robmio" and, for negative "x" values, the result of the integral gives a complex number.
So what is the correct result?
(08-15-2020 01:44 AM)lrdheat Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Albert,
Are you sure about this? When I do this problem using numerical integration On the Prime, Classpad, and TI-30X Pro Math Print, I get 3.46+ which equals the “correct” NSpire result. This does not agree with your result (unless I am doing something wrong...).
To reproduce your result, I am assuming integral limit from -1 to 1
XCas> gaussquad((x^2-2*x+1)^(4/3), x=-1 .. 1) → 3.46342047702
F(x) = 3/11 * (x-1) * abs(x-1)^(8/3)
F(1) - F(-1) = - F(-1) = 3.46342047702 ...
I’m sorry...I was integrating from 1 to 3. Do you get the same answer (that would imply symmetry about x=1). In the morning, I will check out the graph!
(08-15-2020 05:20 AM)lrdheat Wrote: [ -> ]I was integrating from 1 to 3. Do you get the same answer (that would imply symmetry about x=1).
Yes, f(x)=|x-1|^(8/3) have symmetry at x=1. But, for F(x), we need to flip the sign.
Because F(1)=0, integrating from 1 to 3 is same as -1 to 1
F(3) - F(1) = F(1+2) = - F(1-2) = F(1) - F(-1)
FYI, here is an equivalent F(x), using surd:
XCas> F := int(surd(x-1,3)^8,x)
"Temporary replacing surd/NTHROOT by fractional powers"
→ \(\frac{3}{11} \cdot \left(3\mbox{ NTHROOT }(x-1)\right)^{2} \left(x-1\right)^{3}\) // = \(\frac{3}{11} \cdot \left(3\mbox{ NTHROOT }(x-1)\right)^{11}\)