HP Forums

An extract from In Defense of Linear Quadrature Rules, William Squire (Aerospace Engineering Dept., West Virginia University), Comp. & Maths with Apple, Vol. 7, pp. 147.-149, Pergamon Press Ltd., 1981

Abstract--lt is shown that appropiate linear quadrature rules can handle integrands with singularities at or near the end points more effectively than the nonlinear methods proposed by Werner and Wuytack. A special 10 point Gauss rule gives good results. A method with exponential convergence gives high accuracy with a moderate number of nodes. Both procedures were implemented on a programmable hand calculator.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this note is to demonstrate that:
(1) a special 10 point Gauss rule for integrands with singularities at or near the endpoints proposed by Harris and Evans [2] will give results comparing favourably to any other procedure using a comparable number of nodes.
(2) A quadrature rule, which Stenger [3] has shown to have exponential convergence, gives very accurate results for such integrands with a moderate number of function evaluations.
Both these procedures were implemented on an SR 52 programmable hand calculator.
…
The SR-52 implementation is given in Appendix A …
…
The method was implemented on an SR-52 as described in Appendix B …
…
APPENDIX A
Harris-Evans 10 point rule …
…
APPENDIX B
SR-52 program for Stenger quadrature (equation 1) …

BEST!
SlideRule

Thank you, SlideRule.
I tried this modified point / weight quadrature on \(\int _0^6 e^{x^3}\; dx ≈ 5.963938092 × 10^{91}\)

gp/gw from Gaussian Quadrature Weights and Abscissae (n=10, rounded to 10 digits)
mp/mw is modified points/weights from In Defense of Linear Quadrature Rules, table 1

lua> gp = {0.1488743390, 0.4333953941, 0.6794095683, 0.8650633667, 0.9739065285}
lua> gw = {0.2955242247, 0.2692667193, 0.2190863625, 0.1494513492, 0.06667134431}
lua> mp = {0.2295037173, 0.6364758401, 0.9015072053, 0.9928383122, 0.9999843443}
lua> mw = {0.4501100825, 0.3483026852, 0.1744679776, 0.02696299772, 0.0001562579734}

lua> function integ(f,a,b,p,w) -- 10 points quadrature
:         local t, m, c = 0, (b-a)/2, (b+a)/2
:         for i=1,5 do t = t + (f(-m*p[i]+c) + f(m*p[i]+c)) * w[i] end
:         return m * t
:     end

lua> function f(x) return math.exp(x^3) end
lua> integ(f, 0, 6, gp, gw)     → 3.052910317e+089
lua> integ(f, 0, 6, mp, mw)   → 5.444304730e+091

Modified point/wieght looks much closer.
However, if we integrate only the dominant part, plain guassian points is better.

lua> integ(f, 5.50, 6, gp, gw)     → 5.942395811e+091
lua> integ(f, 5.50, 6, mp, mw)   → 5.577982336e+091

lua> integ(f, 5.75, 6, gp, gw)     → 5.963893713e+091
lua> integ(f, 5.75, 6, mp, mw)   → 5.907966288e+091