07-25-2014, 07:31 PM
Martin,
Since you started this way let me tell you that you should have referred to ISO 9001 instead
Anyway, to your points:
d:-)
P.S.: Thus the manuals of next batch will contain 372 pages. And they will have those errors corrected (and also the one reported by Didier). So much about the CIP (cf. ISO 9001, 8.5.1).
Edited to correct a typo in a foreign language.
(07-25-2014 02:38 PM)Martin Hepperle Wrote: [ -> ]A few things which also slipped through ISO 9000 quality control and might be improved for the next printing run:Otherwise I am very happy with the manual and appreciate the work that went into it - even if it falls into the battleship class of manuals with its armor plated covers ;-). The metal spiral binding is very nice and handy, much better that those cheap plastic or perfect bindings.
- p. 127, comments at step 010 ... I cannot find the local label 11 ...
- p. 132, lines 7-10, duplicate text?
- A slighly wider inner margin ("Bundsteg") could avoid holes being punched through some of the text.
Since you started this way let me tell you that you should have referred to ISO 9001 instead
Anyway, to your points:
- That should read 03 instead (must be a very old error, found it in v3.1 already). Thanks for reporting
- Thanks again - that's a younger one.
- That's what I recognized first when I got that batch - the next print batch will get 3mm more inner margin (there must be some asymmetry in the cutting machine - compare the inner margins on opposite pages). The proof print wasn't spiral bound so it couldn't be detected earlier
d:-)
P.S.: Thus the manuals of next batch will contain 372 pages. And they will have those errors corrected (and also the one reported by Didier). So much about the CIP (cf. ISO 9001, 8.5.1).
Edited to correct a typo in a foreign language.