Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other

11012017, 05:32 PM
Post: #1




Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
Considering real numbers that are very close to integer. That is a real number R is close to an integer I:
R = I + e Where e = +/ a small number like 1e8 or even less. If I represent R using complex number notation (I, e), would the use of complex math operations (adding, subtracting, etc.) between two nearintegervalue floatingpoint numbers, yield more accurate results than straight forward operations between these same numbers? That is, for example: R1 * R1 is less accurate than? (I1, e1) * (I2, e2) Namir 

11012017, 07:02 PM
Post: #2




RE: Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
(11012017 05:32 PM)Namir Wrote: If I represent R using complex number notation (I, e), would the use of complex math operations (adding, subtracting, etc.) between two nearintegervalue floatingpoint numbers, yield more accurate results than straight forward operations between these same numbers? That is, for example: For addition and subtraction it seems obvious that adding/subtracting the integer parts and "e" separately improves accuracy. On the one hand because "e" may be represeted exactly where I+e may already show roundoff errors, on the other hand because the result (I1+I2, e1+e2) may yield a more exact value for e1+e2 as both I1+I2 and e1+e2 may be represented with, say, 10 or 12 significant digits each. But how do you want to multiply two numbers with this method? (I1+e1)*(I2+e2) equals I1*I2+e1*I2+I1*e2+e1*e2 while (I1, e1)*(I2, e2) is (I1*I2–e1*e2, I1*e2+I2*e1). Note the minus ! Dieter 

11012017, 07:12 PM
Post: #3




RE: Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
I don't think complex numbers are the answer.
How about 7*X+.0000001 & 3*Y+.0000000045 With some manipulation that would be good for addition & multiplication. 

11012017, 07:33 PM
Post: #4




RE: Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
For multiplication this is nice:
[[ 5. ] [ .0016 ]] [[ 1. .000123 ]] [[ 5. .000615 ] [ .0016 .0000001968 ]] 

11012017, 09:53 PM
Post: #5




RE: Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
Interval arithmetic rather than complex is the answer here?
Pauli 

11022017, 03:30 AM
Post: #6




RE: Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
Namir, do you have any concrete examples where using complex numbers as you propose would yield additional accuracy? If so, I'd love to see them.
X<> c Joe 

11022017, 04:20 AM
Post: #7




RE: Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
With a little (but still constant) more work, Khahan summation is useful. This guarantees control of rounding errors in sum.


11022017, 04:39 AM
Post: #8




RE: Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
(11022017 03:30 AM)Joe Horn Wrote: Namir, do you have any concrete examples where using complex numbers as you propose would yield additional accuracy? If so, I'd love to see them. Say we have: R1 = 5.00000001 = (5, 0.00000001) =(I1, e1) R1 = 4.00000001 = (4, 0.00000001) =(I2, e2) Is R1 * R2 less accurate than (I1, e1) * (I2, e2)? Is R1/R2 less accurate than (I1, e1) / (I2, e2)? Namir 

11032017, 03:43 AM
Post: #9




RE: Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
As you are not using the structure of the complex numbers, a list or an array of reals (or integers) may be easier to use.


11032017, 08:32 PM
Post: #10




RE: Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
Hi Namir!
When I was Mechanical Engineer student (17 years ago! OMG!!), I wrote short routines on my 32SII for calculating numbers with errors. For example if I want to calculate what is the error of volume of a cylinder if the diameter is (0.2 +/ 0.01)m and the height is (0.5 +/ 0.015)m I must to know how to calculate (0.2 +/ 0.01)^2×PI÷4×(0.5 +/ 0.015). Here is my routines: HP32SII Calculation with intervals.pdf, please check it. The available routines:
Enjoy! Csaba 

11052017, 01:48 PM
Post: #11




RE: Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
(11032017 08:32 PM)Csaba Tizedes Wrote: calculating numbers with errors ...what a silence here I guess this is not so high. It is based on this (Wikipedia). 17 years before my programming attitude was so strange and I found some unthinking part (eg. LBL K), so it is required to update. By the way with these routines easy to solve all error propagation calculation during engineering work. With new calculators which are capable to do differentiation, this task is more easily solvable. Csaba 

11052017, 01:57 PM
Post: #12




RE: Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
(11052017 01:48 PM)Csaba Tizedes Wrote: ...what a silence here I guess this is not so high. Probably the main reason for lack of feedback is the document is not in English, and most readers here are English speaking, with a lot of Spanish, French and German as well, however the document appeared to me to be in a different language than any of these. Bob Prosperi 

11052017, 06:06 PM
Post: #13




RE: Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
(11052017 01:57 PM)rprosperi Wrote:(11052017 01:48 PM)Csaba Tizedes Wrote: ...what a silence here I guess this is not so high. Looks Hungarian to me (Google Translate of one of the words, and Csaba Tizedes' profile). 

11052017, 07:46 PM
Post: #14




RE: Question for Joe Horn, Dieter, and other
(11052017 06:06 PM)DGM Wrote: Looks Hungarian to me (Google Translate of one of the words, and Csaba Tizedes' profile). Yes, this is Hungarian, but  unfortunately  I typed it without accents, therefore hard to translate it with Google (and Hungarian agglutinative language, therefore real challenge for the Google to translate from/to Hungarian). By the way, this is not that what Namir is requested. Csaba 

« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)