Post Reply 
SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency
12-23-2017, 08:32 PM
Post: #5
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency
(12-23-2017 08:26 PM)Gene Wrote:  Marketing might be another reason.

As it was, the TI58/59 had 480 or 960 steps.

Merged, the number would have been **lower** and less of a way to appear > HP.

Ah! I see your point. If I understand you correctly, for TI to implement merged codes, more memory would be consumed, thus again limiting the program step/memory register count. Good point!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Matt Agajanian - 12-23-2017 08:32 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)