Post Reply 
newRPL: Alpha demo 0.9 released [UPDATED 2017-10-25]
08-29-2017, 03:26 PM
Post: #73
RE: newRPL: Alpha demo 0.9 released [UPDATED 2017-08-24]
(08-29-2017 05:47 AM)The Shadow Wrote:  Something else. I generated a long list of Gaussian primes in the first quadrant - in other words, a long list of both complex numbers and integers. (The list is 1514 entries long.)

139 is in the list. I did 139 POS, and got back 0. Then I did (139 0) POS, and got a result. When I did GET on the result, I got 139. I've tried this with smaller lists, but so far I haven't gotten the same behavior.

I'll take a deep look, size of the list doesn't really matter. Any chance you could copy/paste the list with the simulator (or SDSTO to an SD card with your 50g) and send it to me via PM or email? I want to see what's in that list that made the == operator fail, although the same function that compares (139 0) to 139 does the comparison of the real part of 139.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Messages In This Thread
RE: newRPL: Alpha demo 0.9 released [UPDATED 2017-08-24] - Claudio L. - 08-29-2017 03:26 PM

User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)