Post Reply 
Works in Mathematica
03-05-2014, 12:14 PM
Post: #14
RE: assume() Command
(03-05-2014 07:24 AM)parisse Wrote:  
(03-04-2014 10:59 PM)Mark Hardman Wrote:  Example, to define -pi < s < pi:

assume(s>-pi)
additionally(s<pi)
about(s)
Or in one command assume(s>-pi && s<pi)

Thanks Parisse, very useful hint (for many uses); also I find it more concise this way.

Can I use assume() to assert that a variable must be real (to exclude imaginary solutions)?

Also, does the above example automatically impy only real solutions?

--Bob Prosperi
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Works in Mathematica - dan_h - 03-02-2014, 03:11 PM
RE: Works in Mathematica - parisse - 03-02-2014, 03:49 PM
RE: Works in Mathematica - jebem - 03-03-2014, 09:27 PM
RE: Works in Mathematica - dan_h - 03-02-2014, 03:59 PM
Assume Command - dan_h - 03-03-2014, 07:46 PM
RE: Works in Mathematica - jebem - 03-03-2014, 10:05 PM
RE: assume() Command - rprosperi - 03-04-2014, 07:43 PM
RE: Works in Mathematica - Han - 03-04-2014, 09:46 PM
RE: Works in Mathematica - Mark Hardman - 03-04-2014, 10:59 PM
RE: assume() Command - rprosperi - 03-05-2014, 04:30 AM
RE: Works in Mathematica - parisse - 03-05-2014, 07:24 AM
RE: assume() Command - rprosperi - 03-05-2014 12:14 PM
RE: Works in Mathematica - parisse - 03-04-2014, 09:38 AM
RE: Works in Mathematica - jebem - 03-04-2014, 03:03 PM
RE: Works in Mathematica - parisse - 03-05-2014, 01:13 PM
RE: Works in Mathematica - Mark Hardman - 03-05-2014, 10:02 PM
RE: Works in Mathematica - Han - 03-06-2014, 03:05 AM
RE: Works in Mathematica - Joe Horn - 03-06-2014, 12:27 PM
RE: Works in Mathematica - DGM - 03-06-2014, 09:56 PM
RE: Works in Mathematica - Joe Horn - 03-06-2014, 11:37 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)