Post Reply 
GROBW/GROBH vs GROBW_P/GROBH_P
10-12-2018, 05:36 AM
Post: #12
RE: GROBW/GROBH vs GROBW_P/GROBH_P
Hello,

To add-lib to what Tim said, Cartesian coordinates are linked with the function grapher.
The function grapher does "lie" somewhat to the user in the xmin/xmax in order to try to generate simpler per pixel coordinates and to "hide" the menu...

The programming graphic drawing functions both have 2 versions. Per pixel and cartesian.

The "idea"/"design" behind the 2 was that, programmers would use the per pixel version for pretty much everything (as it is a 1 to 1 map).

There is one exception of course, it is if you want to draw things that will interract/intermesh with drawing coming from the function grapher. In this case, you should be using cartesian coordinates in order to make sure that the mappings are the same.

Cyrille

Although I work for the HP calculator group, the views and opinions I post here are my own. I do not speak for HP.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
GROBW/GROBH vs GROBW_P/GROBH_P - sasa - 10-10-2018, 11:27 PM
RE: GROBW/GROBH vs GROBW_P/GROBH_P - sasa - 10-11-2018, 02:34 AM
RE: GROBW/GROBH vs GROBW_P/GROBH_P - sasa - 10-11-2018, 01:27 PM
RE: GROBW/GROBH vs GROBW_P/GROBH_P - sasa - 10-11-2018, 07:34 PM
RE: GROBW/GROBH vs GROBW_P/GROBH_P - sasa - 10-11-2018, 12:52 PM
RE: GROBW/GROBH vs GROBW_P/GROBH_P - cyrille de brébisson - 10-12-2018 05:36 AM
RE: GROBW/GROBH vs GROBW_P/GROBH_P - sasa - 10-12-2018, 06:46 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)