In support of the 33s & 35s

[pier4r]

(01-02-2018 05:13 PM)Michael de Estrada Wrote:  And another:

HP-34C (Spice): N=10, 46 seconds, Result=13.71183501

What I find interesting is that the Spice is slower than the HP-29C Woodstock (35 seconds), despite being a newer generation calculator.

Holy moly this is slow! (ok, it is also a very old calculator)

With my sharp 506w using 3 variables I needed 47 seconds (yes me, typing the different values of X), without that much of time stress to be "fast".

This let me appreciate the old calculators even more. All those people that couldn't use computers, for example due to lack of proper scientific functions or budget, they may had to wait long time for answers to some math simulations.