newRPL: Alpha demo 0.9 released [UPDATED 2017-10-25]

[The Shadow]

Found an issue with local variable assignments via the arrow. If you do:

<< 1 2 3 -> a b c << >> >>

It treats the a as 'a', but it just calls the variables for b and c. This is no problem in a standalone program, but if you call this routine from another that has assigned b or c, you get an error.

You can get around this with HIDELOCALS, but I don't think that should be necessary in this case. Or if it is, I don't see why a and b should be treated differently.