newRPL: Alpha demo 0.9 released [UPDATED 2017-10-25]
|
09-10-2017, 04:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2017 09:05 PM by The Shadow.)
Post: #91
|
|||
|
|||
RE: newRPL: Alpha demo 0.9 released [UPDATED 2017-08-24]
I've noticed that STO+, STO-, and the other STO variants do not play nice with lists at all. For example, if 'A' contains { 1 2 3 } and you do 4 'A' STO+, you get an 'Empty data stack (internal)' error, and 'A' ends up containing 4.
Also, their syntax is different (and less flexible) than oldRPL. In oldRPL, if 'A' contains 4 and you do: 1 'A' STO- you get -3. If you want 3, you do: 'A' 1 STO- instead. Basically, the variable gets replaced with the value and then the operation is done. This doesn't matter for commutative operations, of course. But even multiplication isn't commutative for matrices! Finally, add +, -, and * to the list of things that need to be mapped to alpha-hold. /, alas, has to remain Z by default. EDIT: I just noticed that IABCUV returns an "Empty data stack (internal)" error, even though it works otherwise. By the way, any chance of ICHINREM? I can fake it well enough with a working IABCUV, though. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)