Post Reply 
WP-34S galUS-> l Precision
12-12-2016, 09:02 AM
Post: #23
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision
(12-12-2016 08:35 AM)Nigel (UK) Wrote:  I believe so. I'll put in these new values as a compile-time option, turned on by default in resources.h . Is that ok?

I think it better to replace the older values completely. There is no reason to have less accurate values present given the spot on citations you've provided.

We were chasing credibility with the conversions, hence the canonical NIST references. Yours are better overall IMHO.


Thanks for doing this,

Pauli
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Nick - 09-07-2016, 10:20 PM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Paul Dale - 09-07-2016, 11:56 PM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Joe Horn - 09-08-2016, 05:02 AM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Nick - 09-09-2016, 04:47 AM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Dol - 09-09-2016, 08:04 AM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Paul Dale - 09-09-2016, 08:05 AM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - renif - 09-08-2016, 01:15 PM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Nick - 09-08-2016, 02:49 PM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Nick - 09-10-2016, 05:22 PM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Nick - 09-11-2016, 04:11 PM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Dieter - 11-27-2016, 03:12 PM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Paul Dale - 12-10-2016, 11:19 PM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Paul Dale - 12-12-2016, 01:46 AM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Paul Dale - 12-12-2016 09:02 AM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - emece67 - 12-14-2016, 03:41 PM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Vtile - 12-16-2016, 02:46 PM
RE: WP-34S galUS-> l Precision - Vtile - 12-16-2016, 10:50 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)