newRPL: persistent comments in RPL code

[BruceH]

(06-04-2015 04:38 PM)Claudio L. Wrote:  I think it's worth it, any objections?

What would happen with program checksums? Should the checksum be affected by the persistent comments or not? (I can imagine that it would be useful to be able to include additional comments for my own understanding but still keep the author's original checksum so I know that I haven't inadvertently changed the program).

Also, some people (not many I suspect) may keep a library of programs on a PC with comments that they then expect to be stripped when loaded on the calc. So perhaps the @ character can retain this stripping behaviour and @@ (or similar) used to indicate persistent comments?