On the format of the output of fMax
|
06-27-2014, 04:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-27-2014 04:31 PM by Alberto Candel.)
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: On the format of the output of fMax
(06-27-2014 01:50 PM)Helge Gabert Wrote: Not sure what you are meaning to say, and there must be a typo somewhere in the OP, because fMax(x+1,x=-2,2) is non-sensical and returns an error message for me "Bad argument value." Yes, there was a typo. Fixed it. Thanks! But I do get seq[2]. Maybe we have different settings somewhere in the Prime system? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
On the format of the output of fMax - Alberto Candel - 06-27-2014, 12:32 AM
RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Helge Gabert - 06-27-2014, 01:50 PM
RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Alberto Candel - 06-27-2014 04:30 PM
RE: On the format of the output of fMax - parisse - 06-27-2014, 04:27 PM
RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Helge Gabert - 06-27-2014, 05:26 PM
RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Alberto Candel - 06-27-2014, 07:53 PM
RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Alberto Candel - 06-28-2014, 04:53 AM
RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Helge Gabert - 06-27-2014, 08:51 PM
RE: On the format of the output of fMax - DrD - 06-27-2014, 09:09 PM
RE: On the format of the output of fMax - parisse - 06-28-2014, 06:11 AM
RE: On the format of the output of fMax - Alberto Candel - 06-28-2014, 02:36 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)