HP Forums

For those interested int he subject - an amazing paper that may put the long-standing problem to rest; and it does it in a *very* uncanny way!

https://drive.google.com/file/d/17NBICP6...rEKuY/view

Here's an article on the subject that adds context:

https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2018/09/2...-function/

Thanks for sharing. (we should really have a "thanks" button. Not a reputation / upvote button)

(09-25-2018 07:52 AM)Ángel Martin Wrote: [ -> ]For those interested int he subject - an amazing paper that may put the long-standing problem to rest; and it does it in a *very* uncanny way!

Don't think so.

Also, the Riemann Hypothesis is false so there's no way to prove it true, "uncanny" or not ... XD

Glad to see you posting and thanks for the laugh.
Regards.
V.
.

(09-25-2018 03:42 PM)Valentin Albillo Wrote: [ -> ]Also, the Riemann Hypothesis is false so there's no way to prove it true

Please elaborate?

(09-25-2018 03:42 PM)Valentin Albillo Wrote: [ -> ]Also, the Riemann Hypothesis is false so there's no way to prove it true, "uncanny" or not

Citation please?


Pauli

.
Hi, Thomas and Paul:

(09-25-2018 08:19 PM)Thomas Okken Wrote: [ -> ]Please elaborate?

I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this post is too narrow to contain.
Also, do you really think I would give anyone any details of a solution worth US$ 1 million before collecting the prize myself ?

(09-25-2018 11:27 PM)Paul Dale Wrote: [ -> ]Citation please?

Seriously, what part of "XD" you don't understand ?

Anyway, the Riemann Hypothesis is indeed false so the "amazing paper" is anything but.

Regards.
V.
.

(09-26-2018 12:47 AM)Valentin Albillo Wrote: [ -> ]Anyway, the Riemann Hypothesis is indeed false so the "amazing paper" is anything but.

Because it is now the Riemann Theorem?

(09-26-2018 12:47 AM)Valentin Albillo Wrote: [ -> ].
Hi, Thomas and Paul:

(09-25-2018 08:19 PM)Thomas Okken Wrote: [ -> ]Please elaborate?

I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this post is too narrow to contain.
Also, do you really think I would give anyone any details of a solution worth US$ 1 million before collecting the prize myself ?

I couldn't say. I've never been in that position myself.
Grigori Perelman has, though.

(09-26-2018 12:47 AM)Valentin Albillo Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-25-2018 11:27 PM)Paul Dale Wrote: [ -> ]Citation please?

Seriously, what part of "XD" you don't understand ?

I can't speak for Pauli, but I, for one, was at least hoping for a joke that was a bit more clever...

(09-26-2018 12:47 AM)Valentin Albillo Wrote: [ -> ]Anyway, the Riemann Hypothesis is indeed false so the "amazing paper" is anything but.

*groan*

(09-26-2018 12:47 AM)Valentin Albillo Wrote: [ -> ]"XD"

Doesn't that lie between XC and XE?

I'm met more than a few people over the years with strong convictions about the correctness of the Riemann Hypothesis.

Personally, I hope the proof is correct. At the moment there is a large gap that is as yet unpublished.


Pauli

As far as I read on reddit the author of the proof, while he did a lot a great stuff in the past, is not in a not so clear state of mind. A bit like John Nash. In short collecting ideas but not assembling them properly.

Unfortunately it seems that organizers of various forums over the world just like to collect $$ at the price of one's reputation.

I mean give a problem a go (or even one thousand billion) is great, letting someone that has not a clear mind (although maybe still better than many of us, me included) talk is not respectful towards the person himself.

https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9...e/e6hct7w/

https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9...y/e6j30dq/

https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9...y/e6itluh/

https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9...y/e6kai6j/

https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9...e/e6kzf42/

https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9...sis_proof/

(09-25-2018 03:42 PM)Valentin Albillo Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-25-2018 07:52 AM)Ángel Martin Wrote: [ -> ]For those interested int he subject - an amazing paper that may put the long-standing problem to rest; and it does it in a *very* uncanny way!

Don't think so.

Also, the Riemann Hypothesis is false so there's no way to prove it true, "uncanny" or not ... XD

Glad to see you posting and thanks for the laugh.
Regards.
V.
.

are you sure?
you win 1 million. ???

(09-30-2018 02:11 PM)BlackMi Wrote: [ -> ]are you sure?
you win 1 million. ???

Yes. See: Millennium Prize Problems.