Message #2 Posted by Han on 4 Oct 2013, 10:55 a.m.,
in response to message #1 by dg1969
I think that the app is behaving correctly. (I don't think the HP48-HP49-HP50G is able to do symbolic manipulations with "program" functions either, for that matter.) Use an explicit function in F2 instead.
Depending on where a "function" is created, it seems to be interpreted differently.
Using DEFINE to create MYFUNC(X), MYFUNC is treated similar to regular non-CAS command, which is quite different from a function created using the CAS screen via:
In this case, FUNC is considered as a function (DOM_FUNC) as well as a CAS program. One cannot use MYFUNC from the CAS to do symbolic calculations such as MYFUNC(a). (This bit is not really an issue -- for me anyway -- as I am sure that it is part of the "CAS vs non-CAS" design.) And all calculations with MYFUNC return non-exact values, again as if MYFUNC were a non-CAS function, as opposed to FUNC which is a CAS function.
Strangely, if we define (in CAS mode):
then f is a symbolic (DOM_SYMBOLIC) and not a function. It is considered a "program" in that it returns program(X,0,X^2-5). However, it does not show up in the program list, and does not evaluate properly. In the CAS screen, typing f(1) produces an "Error:Invalid Input"
On the other hand, symbolic functions such as FUNC (explained above) theoretically _should_ work since the calc is able to properly handle CAS-created functions. However, I am unable to get the tangent line feature to work even with CAS-created functions (perhaps again because CAS-created functions are actually still programs).
Now, since f(X) (as defined above) shows up as a symbolic type, I was thinking perhaps this case should work -- except it doesn't either. In fact, the plot shows up as undefined (even using CAS.f(X) in Symbolic View). One-letter functions seem to be treated differently.
Edited: 4 Oct 2013, 11:48 a.m.