Re: [WP34s] SVN confusion!? Message #9 Posted by Walter B on 26 Dec 2012, 8:34 a.m., in response to message #8 by fhub
Never change a winning team ;-)
Some weeks ago, SF told us they want to switch for reasons they know. Now, if I were SF, I'd shut down the whole system (or parts of it) for an appropiate time interval, migrate what I'd think has to be migrated and boot it again with the new UI set up, so after that date each and every commit (regarding that part) would go to the new environment. That shall be backed up by proper documentation of new user requirements if there are any. Unfortunately that's not the way SF seems to handle that switching.
Personally, I do my commits as I did all the time before. I don't care where SF puts them as long as there's a traceable history. The administration of that database is SF's job - it's not mine nor is it mine telling them. If - as you mentioned - there are two traces now, then it may be about time to congratulate those administrators for the brilliant job they've done and to wish them good luck for sorting it out and getting everything on track again.
Just my 20m€ as usual, of course.
d:-/
Edited: 26 Dec 2012, 8:36 a.m.
|