HP Forum Archive 21

[ Return to Index | Top of Index ]

A Woodstock 67 Message #1 Posted by Matt Agajanian on 19 May 2012, 11:24 p.m. Hi all. Since the HP-67 is built on Woodstock technology, shouldn't it be labeled part of the Woostock family instead of Classic lineage? Just wondering.

Re: A Woodstock 67 Message #2 Posted by John W Kercheval on 20 May 2012, 1:07 p.m., in response to message #1 by Matt Agajanian No Woodstock was in the 1960s and in New York. Not applicable here.

Re: A Woodstock 67 Message #3 Posted by Jeroen Van Nieuwenhove on 20 May 2012, 3:40 p.m., in response to message #1 by Matt Agajanian Your observation is entirely correct, but tradition plants it firmly in the Classics series. I guess the packaging is deemed more decisive than the innards in this respect.

Re: A Woodstock 67 Message #4 Posted by Matt Agajanian on 20 May 2012, 10:54 p.m., in response to message #3 by Jeroen Van Nieuwenhove And it does bear a family resemblance to the 65 so, yeah, I'll honour tradition and promote it to the Classic lineage.

Re: A Woodstock 67 Message #5 Posted by Mike Morrow on 20 May 2012, 10:57 p.m., in response to message #1 by Matt Agajanian The same question could be raised much more so for the HP-19C. It's a Sting model even though its core is the same as the HP-29C Woodstock. It's what the machine looks like...an HP-67 looks a lot more Classic than it does Woodstock. Edited: 20 May 2012, 10:59 p.m.

[ Return to Index | Top of Index ]

Go back to the main exhibit hall