Interim table of results for determinant of the AM1 matrix -- should = 1 ... get your models in now! Message #16 Posted by gene wright on 4 Oct 2011, 11:43 a.m., in response to message #15 by Palmer O. Hanson, Jr.
I will soon! Results so far! The ratio column is the error of the model listed divided by the error of the best model. The 39g+ is not listed because I do not believe it can possibly really return a 1 for a result. Sorry...
Calc Value Error Ratio of error to best
Casio FX-9860G Slim 1.00000003696570 0.00000003696570
WP 34S New Pauli firm 1.00000008439107 0.00000008439107 2.28
WP 34S RRM 0.99999711935400 0.00000288064600 77.93
HP-48G 0.99994552277800 0.00005447722200 1,473.72
TI-89 0.99971836185900 0.00028163814100 7,618.90
TI nSpire CX CAS 0.99971836185850 0.00028163814150 7,618.90
TI-86 0.99964680433800 0.00035319566200 9,554.69
TI-82 0.99964680430000 0.00035319570000 9,554.69
TI-83+ 0.99964680400000 0.00035319600000 9,554.70
TI-95 1.00067670842400 0.00067670842400 18,306.39
TI-59 0.99836009871850 0.00163990128150 44,362.78
TI CC-40 Computer 1.00282671000000 0.00282671000000 76,468.46
HP-35s 1.00282960115000 0.00282960115000 76,546.67
HP-28S 0.97096019803900 0.02903980196100 785,587.77
HP-48S 0.97096019803900 0.02903980196100 785,587.77
HP-71B 0.97095056196000 0.02904943804000 785,848.45
HP-15C 1.08020442100000 0.08020442100000 2,169,698.42
HP 41 Advantage ROM 1.08201436500000 0.08201436500000 2,218,661.21
HP-41 Math ROM (1.81476270400000) 2.81476270400000 76,145,256.27
|