Re: Classic (and other) Keyboard Layout Musings Message #2 Posted by Thomas Okken on 20 Dec 2010, 9:49 p.m., in response to message #1 by Mark Henderson
Quote: As I admire my HP Classic and LED collection I'm a little surprised at the apparent lack of consistency and standardization in the keyboard layouts and standardization?
There seems to have been little effort made to keep layouts similar from model to model
It seems to me that HP did, in fact, try to standardize at least the most heavily used part of the keyboard. The Classics and Woodstocks all have the exact same layout for the number, period, arithmetic, and ENTER keys. The CHS key is just to the right of ENTER on all of those models except the HP-80, and the EEX and R/S keys, on those models that have them, are always in the same positions, as is the CLX key on all except the HP-70.
Regarding the position of the shifted functions on the HP-67, I think you answered your own question. :-)
As far as the color scheme is concerned -- I'd love to hear someone from HP who was actually part of the design process weigh in on this, but having no such insights myself, I'll just state for the record that I think they all look great, and even (especially!) the oddball HP-70 looks like it is perfectly at home in the early '70s when it was created. :-D
Quote: but it is really confusing as you switch between models!
Ah, but see, back then, nobody ever did that. Even the HP-25, which had one of the best price/performance ratios of the HP LED calculators, cost today's equivalent of about $800 back then. People didn't buy several calculators; they bought the one that hit the sweet spot between what they wanted and what they could afford, and that was it -- then they'd stick with that one calculator for years and years.
|