HP Forum Archive 19

[ Return to Index | Top of Index ]

PPC vs. CCD vs. ZENROM module Message #1 Posted by Nik Brem on 19 May 2009, 6:27 p.m. Could anyone help me by comparing the modules PPC, CCD and ZENROM. Which one is the best? What differs and what do they have in common? Thanks, Niklas

Re: PPC vs. CCD vs. ZENROM module Message #2 Posted by Raymond Del Tondo on 19 May 2009, 7:07 p.m., in response to message #1 by Nik Brem The modules you request have different focuses. In short words: PPC: Completely FOCAL with Synthetics, various apps, like plotting, root finding, etc, and many utility fcns (mosty synthetic) ZENROM: Completely in ML. Targeted at the ML and synthetic programmer. CCD: Completely in ML. Targeted at the programmer _and_ the user. Unique user interface extensions (CAT,ASN,XEQ, direct synthetics), I/O fcns, PEEK/POKE, Matrix fcns, and much more. You could take a look at the appriorate user manuals at TOS to compare the features in detail. My favourite is the CCD module, and the CCD OS/X (of course;-) HTH Raymond

Re: PPC vs. CCD vs. ZENROM module Message #3 Posted by jotne on 21 May 2009, 9:02 a.m., in response to message #2 by Raymond Del Tondo My favorite is also the CCD PPC is just a bunch of programs. CCD is much more. It do also change how the CAT menu works. You can also type the synthetic program codes directly like RCL-b etc. Edited: 21 May 2009, 9:03 a.m.

Re: PPC vs. CCD vs. ZENROM module Message #4 Posted by Nik Brem on 24 May 2009, 7:00 p.m., in response to message #3 by jotne Is it possible to buy the ccd module anywhere else than on eBay? It seems to be rare there...

Re: PPC vs. CCD vs. ZENROM module Message #5 Posted by ZOleg on 24 May 2009, 8:06 p.m., in response to message #4 by Nik Brem Bye NoV-64 or MLDL2000 and you may use any ROM for HP-41.

[ Return to Index | Top of Index ]

Go back to the main exhibit hall