Re: Strange X-Functions Module Message #2 Posted by Raymond Del Tondo on 24 Mar 2009, 4:20 p.m., in response to message #1 by Juergen Rodenkirchen
Hi,
it's better to check an X-Functions module with a C or CV, not a CX,
because you won't see more X-Memory for obvious reasons...
It's similar to trying to check a QUAD Memory module in a CV: It simply doesn't make sense;-)
At some point in production, HP seemed to have either renumbered the module itself not to carry the package name anymore,
at least I have seen many X-Functions modules which don't have the 82180A printed on their back,
while the whole product (module, manual, box) is still the HP 82180A.
HTH
Raymond
|