The Museum of HP Calculators

HP Forum Archive 17

[ Return to Index | Top of Index ]

Yet Another 35s Bug
Message #1 Posted by Katie Wasserman on 9 Aug 2007, 4:47 p.m.

Here's a really obvious one:

1000
STO J
x<>(J)

You'll get an "INVALID (I)" error message!

While:

RCL(J)

Shows the correct error message: "INVALID (J)"

      
Re: Yet Another 35s Bug
Message #2 Posted by Vincze on 9 Aug 2007, 4:51 p.m.,
in response to message #1 by Katie Wasserman

How do you do x<>(J)? Is it just the X<>Y?

            
Re: Yet Another 35s Bug
Message #3 Posted by Paul Brogger on 9 Aug 2007, 4:55 p.m.,
in response to message #2 by Vincze

It's

x<> == yellow-shifted RCL key

followed by

(J) == decimal point key

                  
35S Yet another bug
Message #4 Posted by Ralph on 9 Aug 2007, 7:40 p.m.,
in response to message #3 by Paul Brogger

It's Latin I think. I is used for J

It's like Visual Basic 6's error message telling me I'm out of ram when in fact I'm trying to save to a floppy and haven't put it in the drive.

More exactly I think they planned on only one indirect pointer and added J later. BTW I'm happy they did.

      
Re: Yet Another 35s Bug
Message #5 Posted by Gregg Bergman on 11 Aug 2007, 7:14 p.m.,
in response to message #1 by Katie Wasserman

Maybe not so obvious: 
While in a program.

A001 LBL A A002 1000 A003 STO J A004 x<>(J) A005 RTN

Shows the correct error message: "INVALID (J)"

            
Re: Yet Another 35s Bug
Message #6 Posted by Katie Wasserman on 11 Aug 2007, 10:39 p.m.,
in response to message #5 by Gregg Bergman

This is even more disturbing.

      
Re: Yet Another 35s Bug
Message #7 Posted by Larry Holmes on 12 Aug 2007, 5:55 p.m.,
in response to message #1 by Katie Wasserman

I wonder if this has to do with the use of J instead of I in engineering parlance, to represent the imaginary part of a complex number? Is it possible that, by using a different paradigm, this could make sense, and not really be an error? I am not sure how to do that just yet; I plan to buy a 35s and go through some of the errors, etc., to examine these kinds of possibilities, but don't have much to say right now, except to mention ideas like this one.


[ Return to Index | Top of Index ]

Go back to the main exhibit hall