Re: Yet Another 35s Bug Message #7 Posted by Larry Holmes on 12 Aug 2007, 5:55 p.m., in response to message #1 by Katie Wasserman
I wonder if this has to do with the use of J instead of I in engineering parlance, to represent the imaginary part of a complex number? Is it possible that, by using a different paradigm, this could make sense, and not really be an error? I am not sure how to do that just yet; I plan to buy a 35s and go through some of the errors, etc., to examine these kinds of possibilities, but don't have much to say right now, except to mention ideas like this one.
|