Re: New HP35S - First FAQs Message #6 Posted by Bill (Smithville, NJ) on 12 July 2007, 8:43 a.m., in response to message #5 by Howard Owen
Hi Howard,
I may be a little bit jaded. I never even held, let along used, the HP-33, so I have very little to compare the new 35S to except for my trusted HP-42S. Maybe the features that Joe raves about in the FAQ are trully amazing when compared to the 33S, but really leaves me a little bit confused when I compare them to the 42S.
You wrote:
Quote:
rescues the 35s from the label poverty of the 33s! That is very cool
I must have missed something in the FAQ. In answer A4 the FAQ says:
Quote:
... However, each "program" (A through Z and the
unlabeled one at the beginning of program memory) is artificially
limited to a maximum of 999 steps each....
Not sure the "Label Poverty" has been corrected. I hope you're right, but... Looks like maximum of 27 programs could be in memory. Also only 26 labeled storage registers - actually only 24 if you want to use the indirect features of I and J.
Maybe you're referring to using the Program Label with the line number in the GTO statements for local flow control as helping with the "Label Proverty"?
Since it's fairly low cost, I'll probally pick one up when it comes out. But I don't think I'll be giving up my HP-42S any time soon.
But it is good to see that HP has gone back to the great keyboard.
Bill
|