Re: HP 40gs Message #10 Posted by GE on 12 May 2006, 4:23 a.m., in response to message #2 by Massimo Gnerucci (Italy)
I too don't understand the HP38 line.
There are 8 lines on the screen, but most are used for the useless 'title' line on the top, un-removable menu (the 28 had that feature, was great - lost on the 48 too).
The syntax for programming is very exotic and varies considerably between FOR, IF and others : sometimes you must separate statements with ';', sometimes not, and sometimes arguments are separated with ',' and sometimes with ';' !?
The CAS is separate from the calculating mode (for example, the default symbolic variable in the cas is X but is S1 in calc mode ??).
Aplets are separate environments which cannot be used concurrently (like the dreaded 'modes' on Casio calcs). Creating an Aplet involves deep black magic and basically cannot be done on calc.
The looks of the original 38 is very ugly. 'Colors' are borderline sickening. The 40S looks much better but is slooooow.
No catalog of functions and almost useless, partial help system.
Of course limited number of variables (single letter or single letter + one digit).
No STO> key, this mandatory function uses one position on every menu where HP 'designer' thought it could be used ?!?!
Most functions are crammed into the single "Math" menu, which only displays 5 functions at a time with those horrible choose boxes (here you can't revert to the old menu system), and as functions are grouped in categories whose logic cannot be deciphered by normal human beings, you're typing commands with the alpha keyboard all the time... but wait, no Alpha Lock !!! Let's Shift again...
I got the 40S (not gs) in the hope that things would have improved, but I believe the whole basic design is flawed.
Sorry, I had to express my frustration
|