Re: HEPAX with MLDL2000 testing Message #2 Posted by Vieira, L. C. (Brazil) on 13 Nov 2006, 8:19 p.m., in response to message #1 by Meindert Kuipers
Hi, Meindert;
Any clues about what to test? I mean, RAM access (read/write), system access, general operation, extended not listed functions operation... As far as I can think of it, if these registers reset their values to a default condition while the calculator is iddle, I see no 'bad behavior' if using HEPAX. The worst case would be a running program stored in one bank and is stopped. If the registers are reset, the only way to continue its execution would be if the program is replicated in all banks. This is what we actually do when forcing all banks in the same address to point to the same RAM block.
I'd gladly go ahead testing everything, but it would be faster (and hopfully easier) if there is a specific area to test and a possible behavior to observe.
Thanks and best regards.
Luiz (Brazil)
Edited: 13 Nov 2006, 8:26 p.m.
|