The Museum of HP Calculators

HP Forum Archive 14

[ Return to Index | Top of Index ]

Christmas cracker joke
Message #1 Posted by Bruce Horrocks on 21 Dec 2003, 7:02 p.m.

Q: Why are cattle good at sums?

A: Because they use cow-culators.

:-)

      
Re: Christmas cracker joke
Message #2 Posted by David Brunell on 21 Dec 2003, 9:03 p.m.,
in response to message #1 by Bruce Horrocks

Noah and his ark full of animals are sailing along, and the water starts to abate. Soon the ark is on dry land. Noah opens up the ark, gathers all of the animals together and tells them "the storm is over; go forth and multiply."

Later, as Noah is cleaning up the ark, he notices two snakes coiled up in a corner. He says to them "Didn't you hear? I told everyone to go forth and multiply."

To which the snakes replied "We can't--we're adders!"

            
Re: Christmas cracker joke...continued
Message #3 Posted by Michael Meyer on 21 Dec 2003, 10:51 p.m.,
in response to message #2 by David Brunell

Two worms go to the fertility doctor. "We haven't been able to get pregnant" The doctor suggested they have relations on a tree stump. They do so, and immediately conceive.

The worms return to the doctor. "How did you know that would work?" The doctor says... "That's easy. Everyone knows that even adders can multiply on a log table!"

                  
Re: Christmas cracker joke...continued
Message #4 Posted by bill platt on 22 Dec 2003, 2:33 p.m.,
in response to message #3 by Michael Meyer

http://www.wartsoc.co.uk/vb.html

                        
Thanks for the correction!
Message #5 Posted by Michael Meyer on 22 Dec 2003, 3:19 p.m.,
in response to message #4 by bill platt

Bill,

I Don't know my snakes from my worms. Thanks!

                              
Re: Thanks for the correction!
Message #6 Posted by bill platt on 22 Dec 2003, 4:01 p.m.,
in response to message #5 by Michael Meyer

That's no problem---you already know too much (or not enough__depending on your philosophical and psychosocial vantage point) about higher mammalian anatomy ;-)

I must say, the *only* reason I caught that error---is that I was a Black Adder fan in college (only a minor fan---but fan nonetheless). Otherwise, I don't think I would have ever been aware of the word! But it's a good word--especially when spoken by one particular English actor with peculiar looks (or in English speak, 'rather a peculiar countenance)!

Regards,

Bill

                                    
Re: Thanks for the correction!
Message #7 Posted by Bruce Horrocks on 3 Jan 2004, 11:45 p.m.,
in response to message #6 by bill platt

While we're in educational mode, did you know that "adder" used to be spelt "nadder" but the "n" gradually moved from "a nadder" to "an adder"?

                                          
Black Adders (was thanks for the correction)
Message #8 Posted by bill platt on 5 Jan 2004, 10:04 a.m.,
in response to message #7 by Bruce Horrocks

Hi Bruce,

Aha, now that is one of my favorite language things--"metathesis", or the transposition of phonemes, especially common across vowels and glides etc.

I remember a couple of them from college--but I am not sure all of them are real--over the course of english language development:

bride--> bird --> bride

a napple --> an apple an apkin --> a napkin

I think we must have made some of these up out of humor---but I know at least one of them is right!

so a nadder --> an adder can go on the list of favorites. Thanks!

Regards,

Bill

                                                
Re: Black Adders (was thanks for the correction)
Message #9 Posted by Bruce Horrocks on 5 Jan 2004, 8:33 p.m.,
in response to message #8 by bill platt

I'm glad you "aksed" (http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-aks1.htm)

"Brid" to "bird" is what you meant, I'm sure. However, neither "napple" nor "napkin" are metathetic.

"Apron", originally "napron" is another example and, quirkily, derives from the same origin as napkin.

                                          
Ack Bladders
Message #10 Posted by Paul Brogger on 5 Jan 2004, 5:34 p.m.,
in response to message #7 by Bruce Horrocks

What about

anode -> a node -> an ode ?

(I don't suppose that's a proper example.)

Antenna -> Aunt Enna ?

(No, that's not right!)

anisotopic -> a NISO topic ?

(O.K., that's enough!)

                                                
Re: Ack Bladders
Message #11 Posted by Ed Look on 5 Jan 2004, 9:29 p.m.,
in response to message #10 by Paul Brogger

Paul, sorry: one last shot- it's anisotRopic. I guess you never met a thesis you didn't like... unlike some people...


[ Return to Index | Top of Index ]

Go back to the main exhibit hall