The Museum of HP Calculators

HP Forum Archive 13

[ Return to Index | Top of Index ]

HP-31E's thin Owner's Handbook
Message #1 Posted by Valentin Albillo on 9 July 2003, 9:08 a.m.

Norm posted to the Add section:

"Hi, interested in HP-31E [ ... ] I've got an "owner's handbook" which is small and thin, but Surely there is an "owner's manual" that is bigger and thicker ??"

Nope. The HP-31E is such a simple calculator that its "Owner's Handbook" is correspondingly small and thin, not 34C's "class".

Similarly, the HP-10C Owner's Handbook is also very small and thin, unlike the very thick HP-15C's. This is just to be expected, there's only so much you can tell the user about his 31E or 10C. You may find some relief in comparing it to the pathetic "Owner's Handbook" of HP(?, more like "KP", for "Kinpo") latest models, i.e. that regal, deluxe, folded A3-size sheet (or should it be "sh*t" ?).

Best regards from V.

      
Re: HP-31E's thin Owner's Handbook
Message #2 Posted by Art Litka on 9 July 2003, 9:57 a.m.,
in response to message #1 by Valentin Albillo

Amen to that!

            
I'm shocked ! bbBBBzzzZZZTT!
Message #3 Posted by Norm on 9 July 2003, 3:13 p.m.,
in response to message #2 by Art Litka

Thanks for the update, Valentin.

I am shocked! The almighty invincible "HP Gods of the 1970's" seem to be ever more vulnerable to criticism.

The calculators have solderless designs, don't properly accept AA batteries, and now, no decent owner's manual for a 31E ??

Ok I'm looking at it now... that owner's handbook doesn't say much about the 3 storage registers..... there are no cute little "storybook" problems, its too quick and too short.

What got into HP at this moment in time (1978), did Bill Gates work there at the time as an apprentice ? ("lets get rid of the owner's manuals, and unplug the telephones so nobody can call us, derr yuk derr yuk!")

Would we presume that the Charlie Chaplin RPN tutorial guidebook "solving problems with your hewlett packard calculator" would be included in the original box of a 31E ??

Hey I still need a furry case.... I'd even take an extra copy of this 31E manual.....

- Norm

                  
Re: I'm shocked ! bbBBBzzzZZZTT!
Message #4 Posted by David Smith on 9 July 2003, 3:55 p.m.,
in response to message #3 by Norm

The furry lined cases were reserved for the more expensive machines like the 38C/E... complete with belt loop so the finance guys could now look like a real engineering nerd.

The 31E came with the cloth lined case... the lining was backed with the infamous "disinegrates into black sticky dust" liner.

Some 34C's came with fur others had cloth.

                        
Every 34C case i ever saw
Message #5 Posted by Norm on 9 July 2003, 7:55 p.m.,
in response to message #4 by David Smith

Every 34C case i ever saw had nice brown fur inside. They did not deteriorate, they are nice even today.

I guess that is the type of case I am looking for. Would take a raincheck on cloth...... wont protect the display as well ....... don't like that special feature where it automatically disintegrates into dust (probably the managers hired a polymer chemist to formulate something that disintegrates the day after the warranty expires).

                              
Re: Every 34C case i ever saw
Message #6 Posted by David Smith on 10 July 2003, 4:16 p.m.,
in response to message #5 by Norm

Towards the end of the 34C production run, the bean counters got loose and switched to the cheaper cloth lined case.

If the backing to the cloth lining does turn to dust, just toss the case in the washing machine. It will come out looking good as new. Let it air dry with the zipper proped open.

                                    
always cracks me up
Message #7 Posted by Norm on 10 July 2003, 5:24 p.m.,
in response to message #6 by David Smith

always cracks me up, board of directors is sitting in their $3000 power suits, clustered around their $40,000 Mahogany boardroom table, in their $8 Million dollar building, charging a collective hourly rate of $5000 an hour to sit there, receiving perks and bonuses of $800,000 per board member per year. SO THEN WHAT...... they come up with the brilliant plan to deprive the CUSTOMER of 14 cents worth of fur fabric to be sewn into the calculator case.

Impressive psychological behavior. Very, very impressive. I bow down in admiration of these boardroom millionaires, they are so brilliant.

                                          
Re: always cracks me up
Message #8 Posted by bill platt on 11 July 2003, 10:41 a.m.,
in response to message #7 by Norm

Norm,

I have an "observed wisdom" concept which the other day I mentioned to someone, who said they thought exactly the same thing on their own.

The idea is simple: Approximately 10 years after a new "technology" or product type (e.g. VCR, CD player, handheld computer, weed wacker, plutonium beta decay powered hedge trimmer etc) has been introduced, you will reach the pinnacle of that product in terms of quality value for the dollar. The item may get less expensive from there on, but its lifespan or quality will reduce. Before 10 years, you have all sorts of problems or issues that really need to be improved.

The basic idea is that in the lifecycle of a product, you go from a rapid improvement phase, with rising sales, to a more mature phase, where the rate of increase in sales is levelling off. At this time, your corporate resouces have also been growing to meet the demands created by the development phase. So, when the sales growth rate flattens (with sales still rising of course) then the company looks to trim costs, because it is natural to think that (1) we should be able to maintain the same profit per unit, and (2) it sure would be nice to avoid laying off lots of people just yet...so we better cut costs--or, can we "minimize" or "optimise" (and they are not the same thing...).

So, that is why the 1980's HP caclulators are so valuable--and so cherished by us. Voyager, Pioneer, even the 41 (almost---someone-argue this one!) are at the pinnacle. We see the quality falling off already in the Pioneers--but higher reliability so they are "better". Look at the "classics" and "Woodstocks" and "Spices" and you find some really great early "built like a tank" features but you also find certain weaknesses....2 disease......

                                                
yup, like a tree ...
Message #9 Posted by Norm on 11 July 2003, 1:12 p.m.,
in response to message #8 by bill platt

yup, like a tree ...

trees all grow the same, just like companies .

They go thru a rapid early growth phase and go from sapling to big tall tree......

then they stop growing, and just sort of exist for awhile..... while moss builds up on the trunk and the limbs....

finally they become diseased..... and the bugs and the worms start gnawing away at the wood....

finally it dies and falls over .

Who are the bugs and the worms ? Why, those critters in the dark blue suits in the boardroom of course....... and their petty little "cost reducers" who steal 14 cents worth of cloth out of a calculator case.

It is the same at most companies.... of course it happens sooner at some companies than others.

Hmmmmmmm and some companies it doesn't happen at all. Those are the truly long-lasting companies and they are the heartbeat of America (since they don't succumb to disease).

                                                      
Heartbeat of america
Message #10 Posted by burp on 11 July 2003, 3:30 p.m.,
in response to message #9 by Norm

Like:

Coca-Cola? Crane (paper) Revere Ware? L.L. Bean? M.L.Condon Lumber? Chris-Craft? GM!? General Electric? Sherwin-Williams? Ford Motor Company!? Random House Harper's Weekly Wall Street Journal New York Times Dixon Eaton Textron Yale somethingorothercolglomerate

Now some claim to be old, or still have the same name, but aren't--they just have the name:

CIGNA GM Chris-Craft Ford Motor Company HP Random House Harper's Weekly New York Times Dixon Eaton Textron Yale somethingorothercolglomerate

regards,

Bill


[ Return to Index | Top of Index ]

Go back to the main exhibit hall