Re: bicycle speedometer Message #3 Posted by Glen Kilpatrick on 19 Sept 2002, 1:06 p.m., in response to message #2 by Tom (UK)
Just a guess, but I believe the 48 series goes away occasionally for memory garbage collection. This may be forced by MEM (probably MEM DROP, we don't want that stack heading for the stars), so it seems reasonable that including this in a loop will most likely slow the first pass, but then ensure that subsequent loops run the same speed, and alternately, just putting those commands before the loop should suggest to the Yorke that it need not do any further checking in the loop (but I'm not totally convinced of this last myself).
Perhaps someone more versed with 48 performance can address this issue of garbage collection.
|