Re: It was , only for effect Message #4 Posted by Vieira, Luiz C. (Brazil) on 28 Nov 2001, 12:34 p.m., in response to message #3 by Joe Panico
Hi, Joe;
you know, I've been reading and learning and reading and trying to figure out some solution and... I keep reading and learning and... §:-(
I wrote some e-mails to some wise guys in here (all guys in here are wise, I just picked ones...) and I expressed my thoughts in a private channel. Not as much different as the ones I expose in here, only with a bunch of personal touch. I accept the fact that some stuff have their moments, and when the moment is gone, it's gone. You see, there was a time when industry used to wait for twelve, eighteen, twenty four months to test a prototype after the blueprints were approved. Today, if a scratch of an idea does not get to final sales product in less then one year (maybe more, maybe less), forget it. This is time enough for concurrent new projects, new technology, less cost, more profits. We know that. And we must consider this as a fact. As carburetors no longer are offered in brand new cars... §;-)
We are not doomed. But a new guideline must be shown! People have changed, market has changed, needs are not the same as in 25, 30 years ago. We don't have -and don't need- to change, just to adapt to a new reality. And despite that all, a good, valuable tool for a job is and will be a good, valuable tool for a job. It seems to me that the job itself is the one that changed...
Cheers.
(you think I forgot? And I think Micheal owes Ruben a win in Sao Paulo; time will tell, my friend, time will tell... §;-)
|