No, we haven't "Been there, done that" Message #11 Posted by W. Bruce Maguire II on 16 Oct 2001, 12:50 p.m., in response to message #10 by Michael Blankenship
Mike:
You seem to have missed the point. I, too, posted information on programming trig. functions into the HP-17BII, except my algorithms also include the INVERSE trig. functions, which is something that we are talking about here. I also included a full program listing. Look in the current forum page for:
Improved TRIG. and INVERSE TRIG. functions for the HP-17BII (Posted Sept. 26, 2001)
I actually had posted my first post on trig. functions for the 17BII on 7/31/2001 (horrible code---see the later post for details). I then followed it up on 9/26/2001 with a vastly superior implementation than the dumb one I first posted. Your article was posted on 9/3/2001. Please look at my 9/26/2001 post for an example of formatting that I think is acceptable for HP-17BII listings. As soon as you go into the Forum, there is a hyper-link to advanced formatting techniques.
The point here, is come up with code to fit these functions into a 12c. The 12c is a completely different programming beast than the 17BII, and is much more limited. That is what this thread is about.
If you are able to implement your algorithms on a 12c for all the trig. AND INVERSE TRIG. functions, please post a 12c listing!
Bruce.
|