Re: Nostalgia Message #2 Posted by J. Lopez on 20 Mar 2001, 11:50 a.m., in response to message #1 by Juan J
I feel the same way.
My collection is not too big, but I'm concentrating on scientific, programmable RPN models. Although my first HP calc was the HP-28C, (I bought it in '87, which makes me a late-comer to the cult) I was always attracted to these magic little boxy, brown and sober machines. For me RPN logic was a natural thing. When you perform arithmetic operations on paper, you write down the arguments first and then work out the answer. After RPN, working with an algebraic calculator is an unnatural thing for me.
My HP-28C gave me so many hours of pleasure, I felt like a kid with a new toy. I remember going through the manuals cover-to-cover when I took the calculator home and not emerging until having finished with them. Only to go out to try to get information on a company somewhere in the West Coast, EduCalc, which carried all sorts of accessories, books and HP calculators. Once I had their address I bought from them often. I still have, and read, Bill Wickes' "Insights" book on the HP-28C. Later I upgraded to an HP-48SX and, of course, to the version of Wickes' book for that one too. They still make a great read and it's fascinating understanding the why's and how's of RPN logic.
"Nostalgia" is what makes me keep these little machines and use them to solve all sorts of problems, even the most trivial. I've just went through the code for calculating income tax in my HP-48GX, which I wrote about ten years ago. My wife laughs at the thought that this puny machine will be able to come up with a bigger income tax refund than my object-oriented, user-friendly, multi-task enabled, tax-saving suggestion-overwhelming Intuit's TurboTax Deluxe for Windows in my PC. I keep telling her that that is the case, so that next time I come home with a new HP calculator, she will understand and accept it (hmmmm, maybe the IRS should grant a deduction for expenses in old HP calculators used for calculating income taxes, huh?).
|