EbayTruth himself speaks! Message #22 Posted by Gene on 8 Feb 2001, 11:59 a.m., in response to message #21 by John
1. Yes, this second email you sent WAS in reply to my initial response to your unsolicited email to me. Guilty.
2. True, you did not use the word "ignorant" about my ebay bidders. You stated "newbie" which I took to mean "uninformed". Think that's correct.
3. I did not "boast" to you that I was getting away with anything. I pointed out how your "truth" prediction of about $130 on my auction was apparently flawed. This was also the case on those auctions you emailed me about from 2 weeks ago - they sold for much more than you had predicted - again unsolicited, I might add.
4. No need to exaggerate anything. You feel the need to email people unsolicited and accuse them (me anyway) of providing misleading information in their auction listings. Find something better to do with your time.
Sorry, but if you bring it upon yourself to email people, you can't shirk responsibility away if they decide to tell you how uninformed you may be.
My conscience is fine. Apparently, your impressions of the auction listing is not shared by those on this forum. That's what I wanted to confirm.
So, in addition to being a price police person, you're also a pyschologist? What does your psych training say about someone who emails sellers telling them they are asking too much or have done this or that without their desire to communicate with you?
The emails that ebaytruth may have sent to bidders on ebay were against ebay policies. Violating rules is another of your traits?
I'm hardly ignorant of HP's or calculators. Not at all. I support them and sell extras that I get and have a very good reputation. What's your reputation and how has it been established? We'll wait.
Continue being the ebay auction price police if you want. But if you continue sending unsolicited email you'll only annoy people who do not wish to talk to you.
Free country, I guess.
Gene
|